WELCOME TO THE DISCUSSION GROUP FOR THE BOOK "THE GENIUS IN ALL OF US" BY DAVID SHENK. PROMPTS AND POSTS ARE STUDENT GENERATED. THIS IS A COLLECTIVE EFFORT TO ENGAGE IN DISCUSSIONS THAT CONNECT THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION WITH THE BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS (LIKE GENETICS AND EPIGENETICS) AND THEMES DISCUSSED IN OUR COURSE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. THE BOOK ALSO PROVIDES A NICE CONNECTION TO THE SOCIAL EMOTIONAL LEARNING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED THROUGHOUT THE COURSE.
Friday, April 13, 2012
The Argument - Hair
Hair color is often described as the one thing that is completely controlled by genes. But, this is not true. Hair color is determined by the protein melanin, which is not directly made by the genes. Shenk states that "you did not inherit... your brown hair from your parents' genes. Not directly" (Shenk 21). Provided this information, could hair texture and "shape" also be determined by the "genes multiplied by environment"(20) theory? Meaning, if you were to get your hair thinned out every time you get your hair cut, would it be possible that your hair ended up being naturally thinner? In continuation, would it be possible to change the texture of the hair of someone? For example, if a woman with naturally curly, wavy hair were to get her hair straightened constantly, would she end up with hair similar to a innately straight-haired person? Relate your response to continuity and change and to interdependence in nature.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment